Southern Leaders To Buhari: Your claim that Nigeria’s unity is settled not tenable
The Southern Leaders Forum on Wednesday
in Lagos faulted President Muhammadu Buhari’s statement that issues of
national discourse should be taken to the National Assembly and the
National Council of State.
Buhari made the statement among others in his Monday broadcast after 104-day medical trip to the United kingdom.
The forum, represented by Chiefs Edwin
Clark, Albert Horsefall (South-South); Chief John Nwodo, Prof. Joe
Irukwu (South-East); and Chief Reuben Fasoranti, Chief Ayo Adebanjo
(South-West), spoke in Lagos at a press conference titled, ‘Only
Restructuring will Ensure the Unity, Peace and Development of Nigeria.’
Others at the event included Prof. Banji
Akintoye, Tony Uranta, National Coordinator of the Oodua Peoples
Congress, Chief Gani Adams; Supo Shonibare, Guy Ikokwu, Tony Nyiam and
Prof. Walter Ofonagoro.
The forum stated that while it did not
dispute the legality of the National Assembly and NCS, the bodies were
not the appropriate bodies to superintend the discourse on the social
contract that could bind Nigeria together.
“While the composition of the National
Assembly is clearly jigged and indeed one of the bodies to be
restructured, the National Council of State is not open to Nigerians. If
any discourse is to take place on constitutional changes within the
democratic framework, Mr. President is the one who has the
responsibility to initiate the process,” the SLF said.
The forum added that the attempt to
treat hate speech as terrorism was a veiled threat to bare fangs and
criminalising dissenting opinions in the national discourse.
The group accused the President of
deploying the imagery of the late Chief Emeka Ojukwu in his broadcast to
play down the demand for the renegotiation of the structure of Nigeria
by saying they both agreed in Daura in 2003 that the country must remain
one and united.
The SLF said, “The meeting between the
two of them could not have been a Sovereign National Conference whose
decisions cannot be reviewed. We agree with their conclusion that we
should remain united, but that does not foreclose discussions of the
terms and conditions of the union.
“The claim that Nigeria’s unity is
settled and not negotiable is not tenable. Every country is in a daily
dialogue and there is nothing finally settled in its life. Stable
nations are still fine-tuning details of the architecture of their
existence. How much more Nigeria that has yet to attain nationhood? If
we are settled as a nation, we will not be dealing with the many crises
of nation-building that are afflicting us today, which have made it
extremely difficult to squarely face issues of growth and development.
“The British negotiated to put the
various ethnic groups together. All the constitutional conferences held
in the years before independence were negotiations. When the North
walked out of the parliament in 1953 after Chief Anthony Enahoro moved
the motion for independence, it took negotiations to bring them back
into the union after an eight-point agenda, which was mainly about
confederations.”
It pointed out that the one sentence in
the President’s speech that every Nigerian could live anywhere without
let or hindrance, if meant to address the quit notice by Arewa youths to
the Igbo living in the North, was too short to check the unwarranted
threat.
The group further said it was miffed by
Buhari’s description of the attacks by deadly Fulani herdsmen on
defenceless farmers as conflict between two quarrelling groups.
“To present the various onslaughts on
farmers by the herdsmen as ‘two fighting,’ would portray the President
as taking sides with the aggressive Meyitti Allah. While we do not hold
the administration responsible for all agitations in Nigeria due to the
crises of unitary constitution, there are clearly many errors of
commission and omission that have accentuated the strong
self-determination feelings across the country which only restructuring
can tame,” the group said.
According to the leaders, some of the
errors made by the current administration are lopsided recruitment and
appointment into federal institutions, breach of the Federal Character
principle, early retirement of mostly Southern senior officers from the
Armed Forces and other security services and concentration of most heads
of Armed Forces and other national security agencies in a section of
the country.
The group identified others to include
the appointment of the legal adviser of Meyitti Allah as the secretary
of the Federal Character Commission, indifference to the deadly
activities of herdsmen and the President’s declaration that he could not
treat those who gave him five per cent votes equally with those who
gave him 97 per cent votes in the 2015 presidential election.
The Southern elders noted that having
spent most part of their lives fighting for the country’s unity based on
justice, fairness and equity, it was necessary to urge the President to
realise the mess the country was in and exhibit statesmanship and not
ethnic, religious, regional and political partisanship in renegotiating
Nigeria along federal lines to tackle separatist feelings and
agitations.
No comments:
Post a Comment